On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 19:40 +0000, Darren Salt wrote: > > Then maybe you should NMU 0.5.3? > > That will need sponsorship. I'm going to sponsor you.
> A lot has changed since 0.4.8; I've created a package "gxineplugin" to avoid > conflicts with other browser plugins just by installing gxine. Then you are more into it than I would be. > > But the question remains. Do you NMU 0.5.3 or I should do it, Siggi already > > gave me an ACK, which is an ACK for you as well. > > Or 0.5.4, which is not far from being ready for release (I have one or two > bug reports to investigate). OK, blame me. Just realised that you are an upstream author from this sentence. I am very slow these days. :-| But anyway, thanks for such a good application! I owe you big. > If you think that 0.5.3 should be uploaded anyway, then the package in my > repository (URL in .sig) should be used, but the "ack NMUs" line will need to > be removed from the changelog since it's not appropriate for an NMU. This is > a trivial exercise and is left for the uploader. :-) I think there's no need for any rush. We can wait for 0.5.4 . Sorry for my bad english, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
