On 01-Mar-2015, Felix Zielcke wrote: > Now it's 10 years later and I think gnupg2 is now stable enough. > So how are you thinking now about it?
I plan to replace the brittle use of the command-line ‘/usr/bin/gpg’ tool, with a native Python library for verifying GnuPG data. Those interested can subscribe to bug#835598 for this proposed change. -- \ “Courteous and efficient self-service.” —café, southern France | `\ | _o__) | Ben Finney <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
