On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Cesare Leonardi <celeo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 01/09/2016 09:01, D. B. wrote: > >> Why did you log this against 3.20.9 if that one is fine? >> > > I reply only to the constructive part of your message. > No, you reply only to the part that doesn't reveal your entire report to be based on a flawed premise: that unstable isn't prone to breakage, and that the maintainers won't already be aware of such obvious issues and working on them. but OK.
