Hi Guilhem, Quoting Guilhem Moulin (2016-09-10 01:53:56) > Fair enough, I shouldn't have rushed this due to the train arriving at > destination, sorry :-P The actual bug I was trying to fix was #834898, but > you released 0.71.0-1 meanwhile. Since your fix is a lot more complicated > than merely stop signing the dummy Release file, I was wondering if your > choice was deliberate? And if not, would you consider a patch to simplify > Sbuild::ResolverBase accordingly?
I worked weeks on finding a solution that would work well for squeeze and at the same time not break chroots with the introduction of gpg2 *and* together with the fact that apt stopped depending on gnupg. So yes, this change was very deliberate as I otherwise would not've spent that much time on doing it in a way that makes everybody happy. That's why I try to find out: what about the solution does not make you happy? Which use case of yours is broken? Simplification is good but why would I stop supporting older setups if there is a solution that lets it keep working? Why would I *actively* remove support for a feature? Thanks! cheers, josch
signature.asc
Description: signature
