Hi Andreas, > if the architectures are not managed by FTP they should also be no > blockers for a testing migration, right?
Correct. It was more a question of cleanliness... > As I said in my recent mail to the list we should focus now that all > our packages are reaching testing (see Debian Maintainers Dashboard > what packages might need some care). Agreed. Will be picking some RC bugs for today. BTW, nice to see progress on seqan2 :) Once that’s through NEW I have a small addition to make that would also get lambda-align in (and probably more seqan2 dependent tools built with their CMake module). Cheers Sascha > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:55:21AM +0100, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: >> Hi Andreas, >> >> apparently the archs with binaries to remove [1] are ports architectures not >> managed by the FTP team. Any idea how to get these removed? My idea would be >> to ping the ports mailing lists or file a bug there? >> >> Cheers >> Sascha >> >> [1] https://packages.debian.org/sid/rna-star >> >>> On 14 Sep 2016, at 16:11, Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Sascha, >>> >>> your gentle reminder about a ROM request was nearly 4 monthes ago. >>> >>> Please go for it. :-) >>> >>> Kind regards >>> >>> Andreas. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> http://fam-tille.de >> >> > > -- > http://fam-tille.de > > _______________________________________________ > Debian-med-packaging mailing list > debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging