On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 12:36:01PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > On September 17, 2016 9:10:56 AM GMT+02:00, Mattia Rizzolo > <[email protected]> wrote: > >On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 11:08:03AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > >> On 09/11/2016 12:32 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > >> > Or is it possible to just not build libproj-java on kfreebsd*? > >> > Removing proj from kfreebsd* would affect a lot of packages: > >> > >> libproj-java doesn't have reverse dependencies are a very low popcon, > >so > >> dropping the package is an option. Now is not the time to do that > >though. > > > >Why not? Would you like/need a patch for it? > > Because we've just had a proj transition for which the last rdep only > migrated to testing today.
That's really totally irrelevant.
The package already migrated. More: all rdeps migrated too.
that transition is done, and the package is just open for business as
usual.
There are no rdeps of libproj-java, so you wouldn't trig any transition
by removing the package, be it only in kfreebsd or everywhere.
> I don't like packaging differences between architectures, so I'm
> currently doubting whether to drop the Java package entirely or
> complicate matters by only removing it from the problematic
> architectures
I don't personally find such variation across architectures a
complication that needs to be taken into account as "excessive
complication".
Though if you would be just happy to drop the whole libproj-jave package
from everywhere, that would be just fine to me too.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
