On Mon, 3 Mar 2014 14:38:41 -0500 Zack Weinberg <za...@panix.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Laurent Bigonville <bi...@debian.org> wrote:


> > I'm not sure this is a bug.
> Well, I would ask that you consider two changes. Short term, warn
> people in the documentation that semodule -e/-d can be very slow and,
> for bulk operations, suggest manually creating or removing .disabled
> files and then running semodule -B. Long term, work on making the
> process of rebuilding the policy more efficient.

Could you please retry with the userspace >= 2.4?

I think that this should now be fixed


Laurent Bigonville

Reply via email to