On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
> I've just experienced another such case after gcc-4.9 was "removed"
> (#785249, which was reported upstream, and probably a whole more,
> some of which are probably lost now).

These all still exist, and generally speaking, they get reassigned to
the new version of the package when someone notices them and reassigns

As far as automatically reassigning, that will eventually happen when
the BTS actually knows that a particular source package was based on
another source package with a different name. There's code to do that,
but it's not complete.

Don Armstrong                      https://www.donarmstrong.com

We have to face the fact that either all of us are going to die
together or we are going to learn to live together and if we are to
live together we have to talk. 
 -- Eleanor Roosevelt

Reply via email to