Johannes Schauer, on Thu 22 Sep 2016 13:35:23 +0200, wrote:
> Thus, I do not think that following policy and only putting package names of
> packages that are actually produced into the Binary field of the .changes file
> should pose any problem.
AIUI it does problem with packages built on some archs and not others:
say I have a packages foo which produces only the foo binary package on
amd64, but on arm it also produces a foo-arm package. When I make my
initial upload, ftp master will be notified about the foo binary package
only. When the arm build gets uploaded, the foo-arm package gets in the
That's why I was proposing to still include all potential packages, just
not the staged packages which don't appear in the unstaged build, and
are thus never to reach ftpmaster.