Johannes Schauer, on Thu 22 Sep 2016 13:35:23 +0200, wrote:
> Thus, I do not think that following policy and only putting package names of
> packages that are actually produced into the Binary field of the .changes file
> should pose any problem.

AIUI it does problem with packages built on some archs and not others:
say I have a packages foo which produces only the foo binary package on
amd64, but on arm it also produces a foo-arm package. When I make my
initial upload, ftp master will be notified about the foo binary package
only. When the arm build gets uploaded, the foo-arm package gets in the

That's why I was proposing to still include all potential packages, just
not the staged packages which don't appear in the unstaged build, and
are thus never to reach ftpmaster.


Reply via email to