On 09/24/2016 05:00 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:39:50AM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >> Apparently non-release architectures on ftp-master are still considered >> for testing autoremoval. > > They aren't. They would be if they were in testing, but they are not.
Are you sure about that? #836342 seems to suggest non-release architectures are considered by the autoremoval script. > The reason you have been prodded for autoremoval is because the fix > needs to be in *testing*, and the package weren't in testing until > yesterday morning. Actually now it's already in testig, so it was when > the autoremoval sent out the last email. Reason for this is that the > bug tracker still thinks -4 is not yet in testing (worse: it thinks -3 > is in testing), as you can see from the version graph in the bug report. The BTS version graph as lists -1 as available in unstable, which is only on hurd & kfreebsd according to the Packages files in my ben cache. I'd like this obsolete version, and all other versions prior to 2.14.6+dfsg-4, to be removed from unstable. > short version: the bts should fix by itself soon, and then the > autoremoval clock should drop itself too, there are no actions needed > for this, and this RM won't help that in any way. > > On the nice side, thank you for caring about non release archs too :) You're welcome. I'll leave this issue open for the removal of the -1 packages. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
