On 2016-09-25 20:10:47, Hakan Ardo wrote: > I'm releaseing my version now, which I suppose cancels the NMU?
Thanks, great. Yes, this will cause the NMU to be rejected. Cheers > On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> > wrote: > > > On 2016-09-25 10:40:34, Hakan Ardo wrote: > > > Thanx. I've got a version on the way that instead applies this upstream > > fix > > > for gcc 6 compatibility: > > > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h= > > ec1cc0263f156f70693a62cf17b254a0029f4852 > > > > > > I would prefer to go with thatone unless you have strong reasons for your > > > approach? > > > > No, not all. Just let me know if you prefer if I'd delay it longer or > > cancel it > > altogether. > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Sebastian Ramacher < > > sramac...@debian.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Control: tags 831174 + patch > > > > Control: tags 831174 + pending > > > > > > > > Dear maintainer, > > > > > > > > I've prepared an NMU for gcc-avr (versioned as 1:4.9.2+Atmel3.5.0-1.1) > > and > > > > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I > > > > should delay it longer. > > > > > > > > Regards. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Sebastian Ramacher > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Håkan Ardö > > > > -- > > Sebastian Ramacher > > > > > > -- > Håkan Ardö -- Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
