Am Tue, 27 Sep 2016 10:27:04 +0100 schrieb James Cowgill <jcowg...@debian.org>:
> Does this have a CVE ID? If not it should get one. I wondered about that. At the moment I just acted on the bug report and pushed the fix. I have to personal experience with the CVE procedure. In the past, just "someone" made them appear. I tried to apply for a CVE using the horrific Google docs form (http://iwantacve.org/) now. How can they resort to such a third-party ECMAScript-fest instead of a simple HTML form for _security_ issue reporting?! Not sure if/when I'll get a response to that. Alrighty then, Thomas
pgp_tp3Nd3VcL.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
