Hey Barry, Barry Warsaw [2016-09-30 14:17 -0400]: > AFAICT, if you specify a test with Test-Command: there's no way to > select it with `autopkgtest --testname`. A couple of thoughts:
You can actually -- they get named "command1", "command2", etc, same names that appear in the logs and in summary. > * Allow Tests: and Test-Command: to coexist. In such a case, the > Tests: field would be used for --testname matching while the actual > tests would run from Test-Command: The interpretation of that would be a bit confusing as Tests: is plural and can specify multiple tests. > * Add a Test-Name: field solely for the purpose of matching > --testname. Of course if Test-Name doesn't exist, it would fall > back to matching on Tests: I'd slightly change that idea to be Test-Command-foobar:, to provide an optional name? Test-Command: would then continue to get autogenerated commandN names. WDYT? Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)