On 10/03/2016 12:29 AM, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 12:46:36PM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: >> since it's been 10 months and I haven't heard back, I'd like to gently >> ping you on this? > > Alas, nothing has moved since then.
:-( > On the other hand, taking udebs from a different architecture is a complete > show stopper. Despite talks, d-i doesn't have any multiarch support > whatsoever -- and we'd need multiarch for every udeb that touches the > kernel. Thus, either the decision to build at least native kernel udebs > would need to be revisited or d-i would need extensive changes. Is there any bug that tracks this? Thanks, Christian
