On 04/10/16 19:40, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Le 04/10/2016 à 19:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : >> Hi Sylvestre, >> >> On 22/07/16 11:48, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> On 22/07/16 11:40, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >>>> Package: release.debian.org >>>> Severity: normal >>>> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org >>>> Usertags: transition >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> This is again the time to transition to a more recent version of LLVM. >>>> This time, I would be more agressive and skip the 3.7 transition: >>>> * takes too much time >>>> * 3.8 is stable with its 3.8.1 release >>>> * 3.7 is no longer maintained >>>> * we have too many releases of llvm in the archive >>>> * I don't remember seeing critical changes between 3.7 and 3.8 >>> >>> Yes please! But first the build problems need to be fixed: >>> >>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=llvm-toolchain-3.8&suite=sid >> >> Everything got fixed except for armel, which didn't receive any reply to the >> call for help in #820535. So I think we can proceed without llvm 3.8 on >> armel. >> Some packages may need to drop support there or just get removed on armel. >> Packages are already moving to llvm 3.8 anyway. >> >> So I'd say go ahead and update the llvm-defaults package for 3.8. Let me know >> when that happens so I can schedule binNMUs. > Done!
clamav freemat gnome-builder and libclang-perl binNMUed. Cheers, Emilio