On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 6:14 PM, roucaries bastien
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> <po...@debian.org> wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>> On 07/10/16 17:15, roucaries bastien wrote:
>>> I have tried and it seems so.
>>> Due to perl transition I get some transient problem but it seems ok,
>>> except package only available under unstable
>> Alright. This is small enough that should be fine in any case.
>> You can go ahead.
> I need to upgrade a newer version to experimental fixing two CVE... I
> will prefer to use the newest version and I am rebuilding for
> they are now two problems
> k3b FTBS for unstable #838516
> pythonmagick need to be upgraded to newer version
> It is a good idea to upgrade pythonmagick due to security concern.
>> I wonder why you called the new package libmagick++-6.q16-6v6 rather than
>> libmagick++-6.q16-6. That seems like a mistake, though I guess just leave it
>> like that now, no need to go through NEW and add conflicts/replaces etc just
>> a cosmetic change.
> Because some experimental version get a libmagick++-6.q16-6 then they
> are an ABI problem due to newer g++
> So double bump.
Uploaded new version waiting for green light