On 2016-10-15 16:09, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 03:59:16PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> Huh? The only architecture with outdated binaries is powerpcspe (which
>> only "successfully" built them in the past thanks to a nocheck buildd).
>> Feel free to get them decrufted as well.
> What about
>    arm64: 
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=pocl&arch=arm64&ver=0.13-8&stamp=1476101601
>    armhf: 
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=pocl&arch=armhf&ver=0.13-8&stamp=1476101525
>    mips:  
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=pocl&arch=mips&ver=0.13-8&stamp=1476107564
> and all those others listed here
>    https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pocl 

Right, pocl FTBFS everywhere except linux-i386/amd64, and always has
(with maybe some spurious successes when tests were not being run).
Everything outdated on the release architectures has been decrufted.

Or did you want to file a *wishlist* bug to support more architectures?
FTBFS on an architecture where it has not been built before (i.e. no
outdated binary packages in the archive that would prevent testing
migration) is not RC.


Reply via email to