Re: Valentin Vidic 2016-10-16 <20161016081037.btwvht6ol4ro2...@gavran.carpriv.carnet.hr> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 09:39:22AM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > > Don't get me wrong, I would also like to see it handled via systemd, > > but at the moment I think it would cause more trouble than it would > > solve. > > What if we move inetd to recommends and ship systemd service in disabled > state? It should not break the upgrade and still allow users to remove > inetd if this is the only inet daemon they need to run.
That might work, I guess. Christoph
