Re: Valentin Vidic 2016-10-16
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 09:39:22AM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > Don't get me wrong, I would also like to see it handled via systemd,
> > but at the moment I think it would cause more trouble than it would
> > solve.
> What if we move inetd to recommends and ship systemd service in disabled
> state? It should not break the upgrade and still allow users to remove
> inetd if this is the only inet daemon they need to run.
That might work, I guess.