Hi, On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:57:52AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:34:05AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On 2016-10-17 1:03, Adam Borowski wrote: > > >I see we have two different stable update attempts for openbox, both > > >versioned 3.5.2-8+deb8u1: > > >* NMU by Salvatore Bonaccorso fixing #808138 > > >* maintainer upload by Mateusz Ĺukasik fixing #838326 (RFS #841017) > > > > > >I have no opinion about appropriateness of both updates, but as they seem > > >to be independent, combining them is trivial. Could we have a word from > > >the SRMs as to whether both, or any, of these updates would be acked? > > > > If you're more patient, sure. The older of the two requests appears to be > > less than a week old. > > Yeah, my point is to avoid you having to do a full review just to have the > request amended. It'd be nice to hear a preliminary response, in case one > of these bugs is going to be rejected. > > And there's no hurry, it's not like the next point release is tomorrow... > > > >I guess two updates in a single point release would be a bad idea, thus > > >there's a need to coordinate. > > > > Two updates is fine, but would indeed need co-ordination as one would have > > to build on top of the other. > > Ie, no gain over combining them into a single upload.
JFTR, I'm perfectly fine if -- in case accepted by the SRM -- my proposed debdiff just get squashed in in Mateusz upload, or if he want's to do the upload. In fact I have X-Debbug-CC'ed on my first request, just in case he would like to take over. We are affected at workplace by the former bug, so I was particularly interested to see that fixed as well in Jessie at some point. Regards, Salvatore
