On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:57:52AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:34:05AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On 2016-10-17 1:03, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > >I see we have two different stable update attempts for openbox, both
> > >versioned 3.5.2-8+deb8u1:
> > >* NMU by Salvatore Bonaccorso fixing #808138
> > >* maintainer upload by Mateusz Łukasik fixing #838326 (RFS #841017)
> > >
> > >I have no opinion about appropriateness of both updates, but as they seem
> > >to be independent, combining them is trivial.  Could we have a word from
> > >the SRMs as to whether both, or any, of these updates would be acked?
> > 
> > If you're more patient, sure. The older of the two requests appears to be
> > less than a week old.
> Yeah, my point is to avoid you having to do a full review just to have the
> request amended.  It'd be nice to hear a preliminary response, in case one
> of these bugs is going to be rejected.
> And there's no hurry, it's not like the next point release is tomorrow...
> > >I guess two updates in a single point release would be a bad idea, thus
> > >there's a need to coordinate.
> > 
> > Two updates is fine, but would indeed need co-ordination as one would have
> > to build on top of the other.
> Ie, no gain over combining them into a single upload.

JFTR, I'm perfectly fine if -- in case accepted by the SRM -- my
proposed debdiff just get squashed in in Mateusz upload, or if he
want's to do the upload. In fact I have X-Debbug-CC'ed on my first
request, just in case he would like to take over.

We are affected at workplace by the former bug, so I was particularly
interested to see that fixed as well in Jessie at some point.


Reply via email to