Am 17.10.2016 um 19:56 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 17.10.2016 um 19:42 schrieb Jason Crain:
>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 07:12:48PM +0200, Sergio Villar Senin wrote:
>>> Yes, it's properly installed 3.22.0. I've just moved to 3.22.1 and it
>>> seems it did the trick.
>> I see that epiphany-browser's depends on epiphany-browser-data needs to
>> be bumped.  The new package includes the schema and the previous version
>> doesn't.
> We should probably make that a tight dependency like
> Depends: epiphany-browser data (= ${source:Version})

An alternative could be, to move the GSettings schema files into the
main package, i.e.

That seems to be the approach used by evince.

I'm a bit undecided which approach we should prefer.
E.g. gnome-shell(-common), totem(-common), anjuta(-common),
brasero(-common), cheese(-common) and many others use the
tight dependency approach between the main and -common package.
So this scheme seems to be more widely used afaics.

I don't have a strong preference either way. I'm slightly leaning
towards putting the schema files in the data/common package and having a
strict dep.
What I think we should have is a consensus within in the team, so we use
it consistently.

Thoughts, Opinions?

Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to