Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <perezme...@gmail.com> writes:
> [ Unknown signature status ]
> On lunes, 17 de octubre de 2016 9:42:16 A. M. ART Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
>> > Hi! The only two consumers of QOauth are dianara and choqok. I would like
>> > to switch Choqok and QOauth to qt5, so if we can coordinate to also get
>> > Dianara updated to https://jancoding.wordpress.com/2016/10/ and use
>> > QOauth-qt5 I can remove qt4's qoauth at the same time.
>> Yes, of course.
>> > I haven't yet checked what needs to get done in order to get qt5-qoauth,
>> > but will try to do it and push it to experimental.
>> Please, tell me if it works fine. What is your plan? If you want, I can
>> try to build dianara v1.3.5 when qt5-qoauth is in unstable.
> The problem is that if I push qoauth to unstable the current version of
> dianara will become unbuildable and thus RC buggy.
> I plan to remove the Qt4 version in the same move because the onl y users for
> it are choqok and dianara, so I will push qoauth to experimental first and
> then my idea was to coordinate the upload of the three of them. Does that
> workflow fits you?
I understand that you will tell me when qoauth is in experimental so I
can test if dianara works fine with this new version and then decide a
date to push it to unstable. Is that correct?