Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <perezme...@gmail.com> writes: > [ Unknown signature status ] > On lunes, 17 de octubre de 2016 9:42:16 A. M. ART Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote: >> Hi, >> >> > Hi! The only two consumers of QOauth are dianara and choqok. I would like >> > to switch Choqok and QOauth to qt5, so if we can coordinate to also get >> > Dianara updated to https://jancoding.wordpress.com/2016/10/ and use >> > QOauth-qt5 I can remove qt4's qoauth at the same time. >> >> Yes, of course. > > Excellent! > >> > I haven't yet checked what needs to get done in order to get qt5-qoauth, >> > but will try to do it and push it to experimental. >> >> Please, tell me if it works fine. What is your plan? If you want, I can >> try to build dianara v1.3.5 when qt5-qoauth is in unstable. > > The problem is that if I push qoauth to unstable the current version of > dianara will become unbuildable and thus RC buggy.
ok > I plan to remove the Qt4 version in the same move because the onl y users for > it are choqok and dianara, so I will push qoauth to experimental first and > then my idea was to coordinate the upload of the three of them. Does that > workflow fits you? I understand that you will tell me when qoauth is in experimental so I can test if dianara works fine with this new version and then decide a date to push it to unstable. Is that correct? Thanks!
