On 2016-10-24 14:35:46 [-0400], Michael Jeanson wrote: > After discussing it with Jérémie the rc1 was officially released, I've > just pushed it to Debian, should be available in unstable tomorrow.
So I tried to build the perf ctf I noticed that I need diff --git a/debian/libbabeltrace-ctf-dev.install b/debian/libbabeltrace-ctf-dev.install --- a/debian/libbabeltrace-ctf-dev.install +++ b/debian/libbabeltrace-ctf-dev.install @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ usr/include/babeltrace/ctf/* +usr/include/babeltrace/ctf-ir/* usr/lib/*/libbabeltrace-ctf.a usr/lib/*/libbabeltrace-ctf.so usr/lib/*/libbabeltrace-ctf-text.a to get it compiled & linked. The resulting binary was able to covert a stream so it looks good. > Cheers, > > Michael > > On 2016-10-24 11:06, Michael Jeanson wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm not too keen on packaging something that is not even in RC yet, I've > > taken a look at the state of this branch and it currently only adds > > symbols to libabeltrace1 which by my understanding would not require a > > transition. So I guess we don't have to worry about the November fifth > > freeze. Yes, it adds symbols but I haven't checked if some structs are modified. If some of them are changed and publicly exposed then we would have to have transistion. Sebastian
