On 2016-11-03 22:02:23 [+0100], László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:48 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> <sebast...@breakpoint.cc> wrote:
> > On 2016-11-03 07:45:16 [+0100], Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > fetchmail builds against openssl 1.1.0. So we are good here.
> > fetchmail fails to build with -j4.
> > What do we do now? I retitled the bug. Can you reproduce this on your
> > end?
>  Nope. Tried in a loop of ten with -j2, other ten with -j4 and another
> ten with -j8 and it was working correctly. What's the result / current
> problem at your end?

As you see in [0]:

|dpkg-buildpackage: info: host architecture amd64
| fakeroot debian/rules clean
|dh_testdir
|dh_testroot
|rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp
|[ ! -f Makefile ] || /usr/bin/make distclean
|rm -f po/*.gmo config.sub config.guess config.status
|dh_clean -X.orig -X.rej
| debian/rules build-arch
|set -e
|set -e
|dh_testdir
|dh_testdir
|/usr/bin/make
|make[1]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
|make[1]: *** No targets specified and no makefile found.  Stop.
|make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
|cp /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
|debian/rules:138: recipe for target 'build-stamp' failed
|make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
|make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
|cp /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess
|./configure  --build x86_64-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr --enable-nls \
|       --disable-fallback  --with-ssl=/usr --enable-NTLM --enable-SDPS 
--with-kerberos5 --with-gssapi=/usr
…
|sed -e "s/-lcrypt//; s/-lk5crypto//g;"  < Makefile > Makefile.tmp
|mv Makefile.tmp Makefile
|touch configure-stamp
|dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build-arch gave error exit status 2
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Build finished at 2016-08-26T18:31:07Z

The build-arch and clean rule run in parallel. This was triggered by "sbuild 
-j4 fetch….dsc"

[0] 
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-08-26/failed/fetchmail_6.3.26-2_amd64-2016-08-26T18%3A30%3A26Z

> Laszlo/GCS

Sebastian

Reply via email to