On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 09:10:41AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar writes:
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 02:28:47AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 02:55:16PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > > > > Please remove readline4, after all packages are converted to use
> > > > > > readline5.
> > 
> > > I understand I should not remove readline4 yet
> > 
> > Ok, it seems that most packages have converted, only a handful remaining.
> > How about filing bugs on the remaining few, and then removing readline4? At
> > the current state, readline4 can be removed as far as I'm concerned
> > (provided bugs or at least some mail to the maintainers has been
> > filed/sent).
> 
> the bug reports are:
> 
> 326275

(...)

Thank you. Probably my sample was bad, as the one package I looked into,
I couldn't such a bugreport.

--Jeroen

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to