On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 19:51:47 +0200 =?utf-8?b?SsOpcsOpbXkgTGFs?= <kapo...@melix.org> wrote: > Package: gitg > Followup-For: Bug #766461 > > Hi Dmitry, > > just a few words to say that i'm having an incredibly good > user experience with gitg 3.22. > It's fast, it's packed with wonderful features (uncomparably > better than old 0.2.7 version) and upstream seems to be > going in a very pragmatic direction. > If you need any help maintaining libgit2-glib/gitg, please > do not hesitate to ask. >
I can only second this. I find the new interface much more pleasant. Dmitry, it would be great if you can upload this version to unstable. What can we do to move this forward? I don't think it makes sense to block new upstream releases forever because of personal disagreements on what upstream is doing. At some point, Dmitry, you have to fork gitg and maybe ship it as gitg-legacy. It would be a shame if we shipped stretch with a horribly outdated version of gitg. Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
