On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 17:54:52 +0100 Guilhem Moulin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 09 Nov 2016 at 11:42:29 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > We do want to make this a separate binary, so it's a bit more > > complicated than the patch in the bug. > > Thomas Leuxner's patch from #815659 msg. #45 adds a new binary package > postfix-lmdb including the relevant .so, in the fashion of postfix-cdb, > postfix-mysql, etc. If that's not what you mean by âa separate binaryâ, > please explain and I'll be happy to give a hand on that.
No. That looks like it covers it. I must have missed that when it came in. Thanks for pointing it out. Scott K
