> I'm not satisfied with smbmount's behavior, and really never have been. I > don't think it'll ever be fixed in smbmount (as opposed to in mount.cifs), > but that doesn't mean it's not a bug.
Should it then be tagged "upstream wontfix" and voilĂ ?
> I'm not satisfied with smbmount's behavior, and really never have been. I > don't think it'll ever be fixed in smbmount (as opposed to in mount.cifs), > but that doesn't mean it's not a bug.
Should it then be tagged "upstream wontfix" and voilĂ ?