Hi All On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 22:16 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Abou, > > On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 11:15:06 +0200 Abou Al Montacir > <abou.almonta...@sfr.fr> wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-10-03 at 22:22 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 02:57:52 +0200 Matthias Klumpp > > > > <matth...@tenstral.net> wrote: > > > > Biggest question is: Is Lazarus ready for that? Are there known issues > > > > with the Qt5 lcl? > > > > > > Can you answer this question, or ask it in the right upstream channels? > > > > Yes Sure I'm going to ask > > Any progress on this? I've sent a mail but no answer, I'm going to ask again > I am trying to figure out what I need to properly do on the package to > upload it to experimental and try out if lazarus can be build with it. > If so, I plan to also build winff and check if that than works properly. I think this could give a quite valid answer to our question, if this works then let's go. > @Matthias, should we reduce the amount of exported symbols even further, > now we have a change with a soname bump? -- Cheers, Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part