Control: tags -1 confirmed

On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 07:43:42AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:

Hi,

> Source: isatapd
> Version: 0.9.7-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: stretch sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161118 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> 
> Hi,
> 
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
> 
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..   -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wall -g -O2 
> > -fdebug-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat 
> > -Werror=format-security -c -o tunnel.o tunnel.c
> > In file included from /usr/include/linux/if_tunnel.h:6:0,
> >                  from tunnel.c:23:
> > /usr/include/linux/ip.h:85:8: error: redefinition of 'struct iphdr'
> >  struct iphdr {
> >         ^~~~~
> > In file included from tunnel.c:21:0:
> > /usr/include/netinet/ip.h:44:8: note: originally defined here
> >  struct iphdr
> >         ^~~~~
> > Makefile:353: recipe for target 'tunnel.o' failed
> > make[3]: *** [tunnel.o] Error 1
> 
> The full build log is available from:
>    http://aws-logs.debian.net/2016/11/18/isatapd_0.9.7-2_unstable.log
> 
> A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
> http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
> 
> About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
> Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
> failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.

Odd. I can reproduce this FTBFS. The package has not been touched for a
long time, does not have any uncommon builddeps and (according to the
reproducible builds at
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/isatapd.html)
built fine in sid until a month ago.

I'll reach out to the original author and check myself.

Bernhard

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to