20.11.2016 в 20:48:44 +0100 Jan Niehusmann написал: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 11:38:49PM +0400, Stepan Golosunov wrote: > > > Still, for 1.1 the SONAME change is definitely necessary. > > > > Breaks: against applications using CURLOPT_SSL_CTX_FUNCTION and > > compiled with OpenSSL 1.0 will probably suffice in that case. > > Wouldn't this still be a serious bug as it would - explicitly - break > those applications?
It would be a grave bug in such application if it does not have a working version, yes. Whether or not it would be a serious bug in lubcurl3 depends on how many and how important such applications are. (And how difficult they are to fix.)
