On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 20:49 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Adam D. Barratt] > > I'm a little confused as to how that package was built, based on the > > result of some of our automated checks. > > I build it using debuild on my jessie laptop.
Okay. > > Specifically, debfdiffs of the binary package show that isenkram-cli > > has lost its prerm and postinst scripts, and there are some odd > > changes to the package dependencies: > > I have no idea what could cause these. The isenkram-cli package have no > postinst and postrm in the source, so those must be generated during the > build. Indeed. They contain calls added by dh_python, which correlates with the other issues I mentioned. > > I wasn't able to reproduce either set of issues when building the > > uploaded source package in a fresh jessie chroot. > > No idea what is special about my laptop. Should I rebuild in a clean > chroot and reupload? Yes, please. I've flagged the current upload for rejection. Once you receive the confirmation from dak that the rejection has been actioned, please upload the new build. Regards, Adam
