On 1 December 2016 at 15:37, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> wrote:
> On 01/12/16 17:46, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
>> ...if a binNMU can be done on arch:all.
> Not really.
>> If I try to upgrade my packages to the new libxtables apt wants to remove
>> firehol, so I guess the parameters of the transition tracker are not just
>> right.
> Do you have an apt log? I would imagine firehol depends on another package 
> that
> depends on libxtables11. But I don't see why we would want to binNMU firehol.
> Maybe this is your problem:
> p   firehol        Depends    firehol-common (= 3.0.2+ds-1)
> p   firehol-common Depends    iproute2
> i   iproute2       Recommends libxtables11

Ah, right, that it is. So the issue is in iproute2.

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer

Reply via email to