On Wed 2016-11-30 15:00:37 -0500, Ben Finney wrote:
> I agree, though I took the ‘pyme’ name as a pretty poor sign of fit
> with the Python ecosystem. When I looked at that library the interface
> was terribly low-level – a thin wrapper around the C-style library –
> and the ‘gpgme’ library was a much more Pythonic approach.

The GnuPG developers took the pyme codebase, adopted it, improved it,
added a natively-pythonic layer above the C-style library, and renamed
it to "gpg".  This was released in gpgme 1.8.0, and was discussed
heavily on the gnupg-devel mailing list.

It is blocked from transition into stretch at the moment for
thoroughly-unrelated reasons (see https://bugs.debian.org/846232).  It
is worthwhile to update the version of dput in sid to use the package
that is maintained by upstream, rather than tying it to the
less-maintained python-gpgme.

thanks for reading up on this and for maintaining dput!

        --dkg

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to