From that debian documentation I understood that libtomcrypt fit into optional...
"This is all the software that you might reasonably want to install if you didn't know what it was and don't have specialized requirements." But there is one rationale request for it, package libstorm9 has priority optional and depends on libtomcrypt0. Which throws an error: https://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=stormlib On Tuesday 13 December 2016 14:06:02 Michael Stapelberg wrote: > I’m not aware of any reason why the package would need to have > priority: extra. Is there any specific rationale for making it > priority: optional, though? > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Package: libtomcrypt > > Version: 1.17-3.2 > > Severity: normal > > > > Dear Maintainer, > > > > priority of the package libtomcrypt is set to extra. According to > > policy [1], extra priority is for packages which conflicts with > > others. But package libtomcrypt0 does not conflict with other > > packages, see [2]. > > > > So can you change priority of the package libtomcrypt from extra to > > optional? Or are there any problems with it? > > > > [1] - https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-> > > > priorities > > [2] - https://packages.debian.org/sid/libtomcrypt0 -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
