Hi Matteo, 2016-12-14 14:36 GMT+01:00 Matteo F. Vescovi <m...@debian.org>: > Hi Balint! > > Il 14 dic 2016 12:37, "Bálint Réczey" <bal...@balintreczey.hu> ha scritto: > >> * Package name : fsm > > Fsm is very generic, something like elpa-fsm would be a better fit IMO. > > > That the name for the source package; the binary is, indeed, named elpa-fsm > ;-)
Based on other elpa packages I suggest using fsm-el for the source package. $ apt-cache show elpa-seq Package: elpa-seq Source: seq-el I agree that avoiding generic names in the binary package namespace is more important but there is value in preferring less generic names for source packages, too. Cheers, Balint
