On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 09:10:43 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > > What did happen around the time was the removal of '.' from @INC. > That's indeed what caused the regression. [..] > > The test call can be shortened to: > > # vcf-fix-ploidy -s fix-ploidy.samples < fix-ploidy.vcf | grep 61098 > You missed the '-p' parameter above, which makes all the difference. > It's loading Perl code from the specified file with 'do', which no longer > looks in cwd. The load fails silently and the program continues on with > wrong results.
*sigh* I did see the "do $file", and I tried with and without -p ... and then must have had a "knot in my brain". Sorry & thanks! Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at/ - Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- BOFH excuse #173: Recursive traversal of loopback mount points
