On 15-Dec-2016, Loic Dachary wrote: > On 12/15/2016 11:09 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> > So we'll need to seek another solution. I think correct solutions > > would include: > > > > * Remove the dependency. If the state of that code is as bad as > > you say, this would be a good option; I hope we'll find that > > it's not as dire as you portray above. > > > > * Make the dependency optional. This is recorded in the > > Coverage.py issue tracker > > <URL:https://bitbucket.org/ned/coveragepy/issues/279/>. > > > > * Bring Coverage.py forward to use the latest API for > > ‘jquery.hotkeys’. > > > > There may be other options. What are your thoughts? > > The better option would be to have automated tests verifying the > differences between the upstream files and the dependencies do not > introduce regressions or behavior changes. That's a good suggestion. Even with that, though, we would still have no resolution to the bug you've reported. Can you speak to what resolution you expect? One of the ones I listed above, or something else? -- \ “Holy polar ice sheet, Batman!” —Robin | `\ | _o__) | Ben Finney <bign...@debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
