On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 05:36:42PM +0100, marius mikucionis wrote: > On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 07:51:26 -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have no idea why you're filing a bug against the emacs21-*no X* package > > complaining about a lack of emacs GUI support, but this is definitely not a > > release-critical bug in this package.
> this is because after automatic upgrade the package emacs21 was removed > and replaced by emacs21-nox (which was not my intention) and bugreport > did not want to file a bugreport for a package which is not installed... > Now I think, it is getting clearer what has automagically happened: > 1) emacs21-common and emacs21-bin-common got upgraded > 2) emacs21 required older emacs21-common and newer emacs21 is not > provided, so it was removed. > 3) emacs21-nox got installed as replacement for emacs21 since it got > proper dependencies. > After this, I could not install emacs21 since it required the older > emacs21-common and all there was emacs21-nox only. There may still be a bug here that needs to be cleaned up. What happens when you try to "apt-get install emacs21"? It should be at the same version as emacs21-nox, since they're from the same source package. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
