Control: summary -1 0 The suggestion lacks a compelling use case to justify adding special handling in the program, and makes errors marginally more likely.
On 15-Sep-2003, Christian Kurz wrote: > And what in the case where you have two different files foo.changes > in two subdirectories which are different versions of the package? > Shall dput really upload both of them, when is an experimtel package > or a package for local testing? And why isn't it possible for you to > call dput like this "dput ~/de/bi/an/foo.changes > ~/de/bi/na/bar.changes ~/de/ib/an/baz.changes"? This syntax should > work fine with the current implementation of dput and also solve the > problem of uploading files from different directories. I fail to see > the advantage of your suggestion and also I'm not happy about > another configuration option for that purpose. -- \ “I have never imputed to Nature a purpose or a goal, or | `\ anything that could be understood as anthropomorphic.” —Albert | _o__) Einstein, unsent letter, 1955 | Ben Finney <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
