Hi Scott, On Fri, 30 Dec 2016, Scott Kitterman wrote: > Since you provided the original postfix service file, would you please review > the proposed change in the cc'ed bug: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849584 > > and let us know what you think about the change.
It looks like Bartosz did not notice that the reason why no process were tracked behind the "postfix" unit is because we support multiple postfix instances and the default instance is named "postfix@-" so he should do "systemctl status postfix@-" to see his running processes. The "postfix" service file is just a way to do the reload/restart actions on all the existing instances. IMO the bug should just be closed. Or maybe there's a way to improve the documentation so that others do not do the same mistake, but you should not change the postfix.service file as requested. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/
