On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 7:59 AM, Steve Robbins <st...@sumost.ca> wrote: > On Saturday, December 31, 2016 10:06:37 PM CST you wrote: > >> your package includes some files that seem to lack sources >> in preferred forms of modification (even if removed during clean target). > > No part of the resulting binary package comes from files that are not in their > intended form of modification. I acknowledge there are extra non-source files > in the source tarball *that are not used* to create the binary.
Yes but it fail dfsg > >> According to Debian Free Software Guidelines [1] (DFSG) #2: >> "The program must include source code, and must allow distribution >> in source code as well as compiled form." > > Digikam meets this test. No minified javascript are not source > >> In some cases this could also constitute a license violation for some >> copyleft licenses such as the GNU GPL. (While sometimes the licence >> allows not to ship the source, the DFSG always mandates source code.) > > It requires all sources required to create the binary. Digikam meets this > test. Please ask debian-qa or ftpmaster but you should repack > -Steve
