❦  2 janvier 2017 21:49 +0100, Sebastian Parschauer <[email protected]> :

> It is intended and requested upstream to provide a separate libscanmem
> so that further tools can be built against it. We'll have to rework the
> public API any ways in v0.17. So I've dropped the separate libscanmem
> package for now to get the package uploaded faster. Lintian is still
> happy this way and the packages are working fine.

OK. In debian/control, ${python:Depends} already expands to python (>=
2.7), so you don't need to put it a second time (but that's really
nitpicking). Also, I just noticed that gameconqueror is "Architecture:
any" while it should be "Architecture: all" (there is nothing
architecture-dependant in it). In this case, you should also replace the
dependency on scanmem by:

 Depends: scanmem (>= ${source:Version}), scanmem (<< 
${source:Upstream-Version}.0~)

And the suggestion for gameconqueror by:

 Suggests: gameconqueror (= ${source:Version}

The reasons are explained here:
 https://wiki.debian.org/binNMU

I don't see any other problem. As per policy, there is a whole procedure
to take over a package. However, Lu and Kartik were in copy of your
intent to take over the package since April and didn't say a thing, I
suppose they are fine with it.
-- 
Program defensively.
            - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to