On 27.01.06 Martin Pitt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hilmar Preusse [2006-01-27 9:56 +0100]:
Hi, > > So, what is that now? > > > > - a security leak, which must be fixed > > - rather an inconvenience, which should be fixed? > > For CUPS it was a real DoS which must be fixed, but for tetex-bin > it's just an inconvenience; there will be few systems which > automatically process untrusted LaTeX documents with PDF files sent > by remote attackers. > So, the last hunk seems not to exist in cupsys_1.1.14-5woody14. Should we submit a bug against it? Further I suggest to close the bug now or at least downgrade it to important and close it as soon as the support for woody has ended. Regards, Hilmar -- sigmentation fault
pgpbTi0A4hQD5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
