Hello Salvatore,
apologies for not replying earlier, I was away on holidays.

I was told by the CVE team that I have to use the online form to update
information about the issues. On 10 November 2016 I have sent a request to
update an existing CVE for the CVE-2016-9186. I have received an automated
reply "CVE Request 260788 for Update Published CVE". I don't see any
changes on the page
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-9186 following my
request to update though. I was not aware of 9187 and 9188, I can request
update again but now I'm not even sure this form works.

I also use this form to notify about publishing CVE. For example, the last
issue I notified about was CVE-2016-8644 on the 21 November 2016 (
https://moodle.org/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=343277 ) but the page
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-8644 still does not
display any information about the issue.

Please advise me what is the correct way to update information on CVEs
and/or notify about the publishing. Below is the email that I have received
from c...@mitre.org in the end of October in reply to my request to update
information about CVE 2016-7919.

Regards,
Marina Glancy

Marina,
>
>
>
> The new CVE web form can be used to submit this request as listed in the
> notification below. Select the “Request an update to an existing CVE”
> option.
>
>
>
> **********IMPORTANT NOTIFICATION***************
>
>
>
> Please use the “CVE Request” web form to request CVE IDs from MITRE,
>
> request an update to a CVE, provide notification about a
>
> vulnerability publication, or submit comments:
>
> https://cveform.mitre.org/
>
>
>
> Learn more at:
>
> https://cve.mitre.org/news/archives/2016/news.html#
> august292016_FOCUS_ON:_New_Method_to_Request_CVE_IDs_
> Updates_and_More_from_MITRE_in_Effect
>
>
>
> ***********************************************
>
>
> The CVE Team
>


[image: Moodle] <http://www.moodle.com>
Marina Glancy
Development Process Manager
e: mar...@moodle.com
p: +61 8 9467 4167 w: moodle.com <http://www.moodle.com>
[image: Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/moodle.lms/>
[image: Twitter] <https://twitter.com/moodle>
[image: Google+] <https://plus.google.com/+moodle/posts>

On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso <car...@debian.org>
wrote:

> Hi Dan, hi Marina,
>
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 09:31:05AM +0000, Dan Poltawski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > > please see https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/139466/Moodle-CMS-3
> .
> > 1.2-Cross-Site-Scripting-File-Upload.html
> > > JFTR, regarding this one: I tried some weeks ago to contact Marina
> > > Glancy to get more information abouth those CVEs from upstream point
> > > of view, but got not reply unfortunately. Cc'ing for this bug as well
> >
> > (Upstream here with Marina) we have not reported on these 'security
> issues'
> > because do not believe any are security concerns. We replied to the
> > original reporter explaining this/asking for clarification, they
> published
> > them as 'exploits' despite this and (as far as i'm aware) didn't respond
> to
> > our requests for clarification. This puts us in a difficult situation.
> >
> > The s_additionalhtmlhead setting is controlled with our RISK_XSS flag,
> the
> > 'add these tags' issue only seems to providing XSS to the user themselves
> > (in the same way as a web inspector would do) and the others we do not
> > understand the exploit. If there is something we are missing we would
> > appreciate the bug created on https://tracker.moodle.org
> >
> > Note that new security releases (and CVE's) have just been published and
> > will be published on https://moodle.org/security/ shortly.
>
> Thanks a lot for your feedback, this very much appreciated. According
> to the above I have added a note to our CVE entries in the
> security-tracker at
>
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/851405
>
> to mention the above. Maybe those CVE might need to be rejected then
> in case it turns out that the reports were invalid regarding beeing a
> security issue.
>
> I will look forward for the new CVEs and add them later to our
> tracking.
>
> > cheers and thanks for your work,
>
> Thanks, and the same 'thank you' to you!
>
> Regards,
> Salvatore
>

Reply via email to