Hi Michael, On Di 24 Jan 2017 14:29:47 CET, Michael Biebl wrote:
[please cc the package you are re-assigning the bug to, otherwise they have no context] On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 11:13:26 +0000 Mike Gabriel <[email protected]> wrote:Control: retitle -1 recommend g-c-c or m-c-c alternatively Control: reassign -1 gnome-control-center-data Hi all, I hand over the below bug report to the GNOME maintainers' team. The proper fix IMHO is to recommend mate-control-center as an alternative to gnome-control-center in gnome-control-center-data.Someone needs to investigate, why this Recommends was added in the first place. Only this way we can decide what the proper fix is. An alternative dependency on m-c-c seems wrong.
Other options from the MATE's point of view. * downgrade from Recommends: to Suggests: * don't mention gnome-control-center at all in g-c-c-data Greets, Mike -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby mobile: +49 (1520) 1976 148 landline: +49 (4354) 8390 139 GnuPG Fingerprint: 9BFB AEE8 6C0A A5FF BF22 0782 9AF4 6B30 2577 1B31 mail: [email protected], http://das-netzwerkteam.de
pgpbXNCFnf_Wg.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur
