Control: affects -1 + src:jhdf src:sikulix On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 22:16:53 +0200 Hilko Bengen <[email protected]> wrote: > * Matthias Klose: > > >> Additionally passing -I${JAVA_HOME}/include/linux to gcc seems to work > >> around the problem in my Linux-specific case, but that can't be the > >> proper solution, can it? > > > > It is the proper solution. Same as for other openjdk/java distributions. > > Could you please enlighten us on *why* this is the proper solution? > > At the moment, the only thing I see is some JNI-related packages being > broken by this change -- and adding stuff to the compiler's search path > this way still seems somewhat like a hack/workaround to me that only > complicates things. What am I missing?
+1 See eg [1] and [2]. Thanks, [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=jhdf&ver=2.9-4&suite=sid [2] https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=sikulix&ver=1.1.0-1%7Eexp1&suite=experimental _g.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
