I tried make-3.81beta4. Its memory usage isn't as bad as 3.80. Also it is quite different from 3.80. If I need to port my patch to new make, I have to do a thorough investigation of its memory management. I have no plan to do so until 3.81 is released.
H.J. --- On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 06:25:06PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006, H. J. Lu wrote: > > http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=15182 > > > > I got no responses. If you want to use the unreleased make and think > > my patch is needed, you should work with make developers to resolve > > this. At least, you should make some comments on my bug report and > > ask them to include my patch. I will be happy to work with them to > > incorporate my patch into make. > > While I can understand your frustration, I'm not the person to > convince. The fact is your patch does not apply to a recent > development version of make right now, and this makes it a > non-candidate for inclusion in Debian/unstable because it already > tracks a development version of make. > > I'm not a make upstream, not even a make maintainer, I found this patch > while looking for patches to include in a potential make NMU I started > preparing, but I didn't have to upload that NMU, and back then the > patch didn't apply either. The patch seemed to be interesting for > doko's memory consumption problems, so it would be sad to abandon the > fight for its inclusion upstream. :) > > I certainly would't have pushed a patch upstream that does not apply to > CVS, but since you did, I'm happy to support your request for its > inclusion to solve doko's build problems! > > Cheers, > -- > Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Current Earth status: NOT DESTROYED -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
