Hello Thorsten Alteholz, On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 07:50:07PM +0100, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Control: severity -1 important > > > Ok, as we have a new bug now, I am setting the severity accordingly.
This is not a new bug. It's the same underlying issue, you only "fixed" the symptom that was reported rather than the actual bug hiding the issue. > > On Sat, 28 Jan 2017, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > >Circumventing the required *-rc.d policy layers like this is a > >serious policy violation. (9.3.3) > > No, it is a "should"-clause and according to 1.1 of the policy this results > in an important bug. I'll go file a bug about clarifying that in policy to must. > > >PS. There's lots of other outdated and unsupported cruft in the > >postinst as well, like calling update-rc.d with manually specified > >start order arguments. It seems to need a pretty extensive cleaning. > > Ok, will do so later this year. > > Thorsten > Regards, Andreas Henriksson
