On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 15:42:08 -0600 Don Armstrong wrote: > On Mon, 06 Feb 2017, Francesco Poli wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 14:57:18 -0600 Don Armstrong wrote: > > > > [...] > > > On Mon, 06 Feb 2017, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > > I mean: too many data gets similar to the absence of data. > > > > It often says "NO release-critical bugs were closed and NONE were > > > > opened." and many previous changes have already vanished from the > > > > page. > > > > > > Ah; that's a legitimate feature request. It should probably keep track > > > of bugs which had been opened/closed in the previous 24H (or perhaps > > > longer) time period. > > > > Thanks for converting my considerations into a feature request. > > I think 24 hours is fine, with a clear distinction among the various > > updates. > > I'll probably just indicate approximate times where the bugs were > opened/closed.
I'd prefer to see the changes grouped by update, so that it would be easy to take a look at the web page and see which are the updates I have already examined and which are new to me (visited links are colored differently from unvisited ones in the browser)... -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpG6UISMLmOI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
