Control: reassign -1 src:ola
Control: retitle -1 ola: Source package includes non-source files without 
corresponding source

On 14-Feb-2017, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> control: severity -1 wishlist

I'm sorry to see the ping-pong you refer to, Wouter. I think the issue
has become muddled; I hope my edits to the bug report metadata can
help.

The title was IMO needlessly accusatory, and somewhat inaccurate. I've
addressed that.

The issue isn't about the binary package, but about the source
package; I've changed that too.

As for the severity, Wouter is right that the disagreement about the
correct value means we should stop playing with that value while
discussion continues.

> Just to reiterate, this is my position: […]

Thanks for laying it out succintly, Wouter.

> If the FTP team explains to me why that is a DFSG violation, I'll
> add the "missing" files. If they don't, things will remain as they
> are (and if they don't but do change severities, I'll ask the TC to
> rule).

This surprises me. Do you mean to imply that only the FTP Master team
can bring reasoned argument to convince you? That you would reject
such reasons if they came from different people?

I ask because I am confident you're amenable to rational discussion
about bugs, regardless of who presents those reasons. I hope that's
right.

-- 
 \      “When I was born I was so surprised I couldn't talk for a year |
  `\                                        and a half.” —Gracie Allen |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney <[email protected]>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to